Page tree
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Next »

2/3/2017 Meeting

  • Project interests
    -Received 5 responses from survey. Only UCSB has the funding to support a focus group user study. 
    -Due to lack of funding, doing a system wide User survey is more feasible. 

  • User study
    • Andrea Duda will give an update on UCSB user study project (Agenda item will be discussed in next meeting)
    • Current user studies at UC and other institutions
    • What questions do we want to ask

      • ACTION: Chan will add the Project Proposal document to Google Doc and post on Wiki page.
      • TO DO: Members will use the Research Question in the Project Proposal document for the UCSC project as a starting point for the discussion.
      • Ying: would like sampling to cover broader population to include faculty, grad students, and undergrad students in survey
      • ACTION: Chan will add Reference literature to Wiki page
      • TO DO: Members will read Reference literature as a guide to come up with new questions that have not been addressed yet.

    • What survey tool to use?
      • CDL has Survey Monkey and UCR has Qualtrics
      • ACTION: Michele will investigate the possibility of using UCR's Qualtrics for the system wide survey.

  • Current ebook platform evaluation
    • Current packages, evaluation criteria
      • The objective is to come up with a set of most desirable criteria based on our user survey as a way to push publishers toward a more standardized ebook platform.
      • Refer to Ebook Platform Evaluation spreadsheet on Wiki page.
      • ACTION: Chan will reorganize the CDL purchased package (in Existing ebook platforms tab) into different categories (Aggregator, DDA, etc.)
      • TO DO: Members will look at the package list in the Existing ebook platforms tab and add other ebook packages that they would like to include in the study
      • TO DO: Members will look at the evaluation criteria (in the Evaluation Criteria tab) and add more criteria, if they wish.
      • ACTION: Chan will find out more about IRB process

  • Usage data comparison between print and ebooks (Agenda item will be discussed in next meeting)
    • Cambridge ebooks  with share print copies (B & I)

  • Decision: Will have Regular meeting via conference call first Friday of each month.

  • No labels