| Item | Speaker& Time | Notes | Decisions & Actions |
|---|
1. Attendance call | AP / 2 min | Start of meeting was delayed a bit until 1:15pm | |
| 2. Review of Action Items from Previous Meeting | AP / 5 min | | DECIDED : |
| 3. Role of CKGs in UCLAS 2.0 | AP / 15 min | - See attached documents:
| View file |
|---|
| name | Announcement--UC Libraries Advisory Structure--October 2015.pdf |
|---|
| height | 250 |
|---|
|
| View file |
|---|
| name | UCLAS Organizational Chart (2015-10-06).pdf |
|---|
| height | 250 |
|---|
|
- CKGs are independent from other groups
- CKGs can have a minimum of 2 campuses and can also include members from other institutions
- Other aspects of CKGs roles remain the same
| DECIDED : |
3. Election of new PM CKG Chair | All / 10 min | | DECIDED : Select PM CKG Chair at next conference call ACTION : Adrian Petrisor Send out a Doodle Poll to select a ideal meeting date/time in November or December.
|
| 4. Future Agenda Items | All / 5 min | | - Difference vehicles of communication. e.g., Blog
- Different options for moving forward as a group. e.g., group members attend a webinar and get together later on to discuss what was learned. Or group members offer local workshops to demystify project management to colleagues
- Can this group become more official? Each campus would have a designated expert project management member. Is the CKG the right type of group for this type of kind of activity?
| |