Michelle: If having records brought over, set policies for SC records so it's clear that patrons need to go to campus to consult them
Nina asked about the implications of the network zone for OAC rcords
Josh H.: there are debates about how/whether to import OAC records
Josh H: where are other campuses at on decisions about RLF records?
Michlelle - UCSD's RLF records won't be migrated for the general collection except for analyzed serials; special collections will come over
Cat - UCSF not migrating gen Coll at all, special collections coming over (from chat)
Natalie - : UCR is suppressing RLF holdings records (which will suppress the bib records if RLF are the only holdings) and adding a prefix to the OCLC number to prevent the records from linking/sending to NZ (from chat)
Belinda - UCSC will be linking special collections RLF records in the NZ; we gave up all our general collection RLF records to NRLF.
Tool for comparing MARC records
Michael : demonstrated a tool for comparing sets of MARC records that he will send to the list-serv
Searching local notes across UC
Nina
Hoping to start a conversation on how/if local notes can be searched across campus and possible workarounds
Nina: deicision about putting local information in holdings note – can this be found in NZ or will it have to go in to the IZ
TJ: doesn't think it possible to search holding records for notes, so can see no matter which Primo being used (does that seem right TJ Kao ?) Need to check with other libraries; all campuses decide to put that information into holdings records but have limitations since only so much information can be added. It should be possible to make public notes visible to other campuses.
Local/copy-specific information in Holdings records
Randy
Will the CKG be making best practices recommendations about the use of Holdings records for local information? How are Alma campuses using Holdings now?
Randy: what will the practice be post-migration; recommendations that we can take back to our campuses?
Cat: +1 to developing best practices re: holdings for local info (from chat)
TJ: probably a good idea
Michelle: might be awhile before this can be implemented
Started a while back a running a list of potential practices to harmonize post migration. Anything to add, delete?
340s and 3xxs
Michelle: Should Bound withs go up to RFMG
TJ: can mention to RFMG; they may not take immediate action but probably no objections, but maybe post-migration
Michelle: asked about shared collections like the California Feminist Press Collection and consistent practices post-migration
Randy: suggests migrating local fields so they get preserved during migration
UCI in process;
UCSC has already done this migrating 793 to 973
UCSB 793 will become 973 when they migrate
Michelle: If you come across other shared named collections please send out over listserv so other campuses and check their records and move notes to local fields.
Finding aid links
RFMG decision includes some consideration for portfoliozation; AFMG deferred decision
Josh H.: UCI moving digital materials to Calisphere; exploring possibility of links in Primo; will not be using portfolios for digital links.
Michelle: UCSD have been created link to digitized versions; plan to portfolioize for migration
Randy: UCB/Bancroft doesn't have very many links; mostly sending directly to Hathi trust so they are separate records already. Oral history should be made into portfolios during migration. No discussion about portfoliozation for 856 4 2 link
Josh F.: not involved in decisions about what will happen in the newsystem
Belinda: UCSC had some issues with links not showing up unless signed into Primo; they did turn into portfolios but those are not working as intended
Nina: UCLA local discovery hasn't discussed this
Michelle: bring question to statewide discovery
TJ: portfolio easier to manage but not ideal for system-wide discovery
How to leverage local data consistently (discussion topic above add.)
Campus updates
All
Question raised about future meetings and whether to continue having monthly meetings given the onset of SILS?
Agreement to continue with monthly meetings, except maybe in July and August.
